Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 14:04:05 GMT -5
Suns receive Klay Thompson $17.83, $18.99
Grizzles receive Kris Dunn $4.05, $4.22, $5.35
Nikola Vucevic $12.25, $12.75
Think this trade is fair for both teams. Hard to give up dunn after being trade to the Bulls... think he can turn around his career and develop into a solid PG. Vucevic has always shown potential but has never reached the level that i thought he could at this point in his career.
Thompson provided me with the SG help i need and anyone who can score 60 points on 13 dribble is insanely talented. Also with the Warriors already winning 2 ships i can see Thompson signing with a new team after his contract expires with them to prove his greatness and that he doesn't need Curry and Green and Durant to win.
Grizzles to accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by Memphis Grizzlies (Luke) on Jun 24, 2017 14:07:53 GMT -5
Accept. Taking a chance on Dunn liked him last yr and think the Bulls will give him some freedom to be a productive fantasy player
Vucevic is underrated and on a pretty nice contract
|
|
|
|
Post by Yacob (freelance idiot) on Jun 24, 2017 15:19:30 GMT -5
approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden State Warriors (Caleb) on Jun 24, 2017 15:22:00 GMT -5
Ugh really don't like this for Suns and think he may end up regretting it. Dunn is in a spot now were he will be given every chance to suceed. Vucevic alone averaged more than Klay. Is it veto able? Probably not, but i sure don't like it for Suns.
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls (Charlie) on Jun 24, 2017 15:32:16 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder (Loren) on Jun 24, 2017 16:56:02 GMT -5
veto. sorry this is way too much for klay
|
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies GM (Royce) on Jun 24, 2017 17:28:17 GMT -5
Approve
It's not great for the Suns but Klay plays a position that's tough to get great value from and Dunn has proven anything
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 19:18:48 GMT -5
OKC I'm curios to why you think that. Looking at how you let the celtics trade Jokic who probably a top 3 center and can get you a triple double for Fultz who is probably gonna be more of a SG then PG cause ben simmons is gonna play point forward for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden State Warriors (Caleb) on Jun 24, 2017 20:04:11 GMT -5
OKC I'm curios to why you think that. Looking at how you let the celtics trade Jokic who probably a top 3 center and can get you a triple double for Fultz who is probably gonna be more of a SG then PG cause ben simmons is gonna play point forward for them. What? How is that deal relevant to this at all? Fultz is a potential star, people love to get mad when people trade given production for potential production and never give credit when it actually works out. If Fultz is a super star and is locked up cheap it works out for Yacob who doesn't have a point guard and is loaded down low. Meanwhile you just traded for a player who has hit his peak and because missed shots are -1 is limited while giving away a guy who is cheaper, younger, and scored five points more all while adding a guy who went 5th overall a year ago. Oh and btw he was just traded to a team that should let him have all the minutes he needs to develop. No offense really but I don't get why you're coming in here just telling people they're voting wrong and that trades shouldn't be passed. Why don't you chill and get a feel for the league before you start throwing shit out there. Like not saying you can't have opinions or even that this couldn't end up working out for you, but cmon man |
|
|
|
Post by Yacob (freelance idiot) on Jun 24, 2017 20:18:51 GMT -5
OKC I'm curios to why you think that. Looking at how you let the celtics trade Jokic who probably a top 3 center and can get you a triple double for Fultz who is probably gonna be more of a SG then PG cause ben simmons is gonna play point forward for them. You gots a long ways to go, young fella. Lol |
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies GM (Royce) on Jun 24, 2017 20:37:59 GMT -5
OKC I'm curios to why you think that. Looking at how you let the celtics trade Jokic who probably a top 3 center and can get you a triple double for Fultz who is probably gonna be more of a SG then PG cause ben simmons is gonna play point forward for them. Don't take it personally when people veto haha they're just trying to protect your team. If you're ok with your deal then who cares what anyone else thinks! |
|
|
|
Post by Memphis Grizzlies (Luke) on Jun 24, 2017 20:58:52 GMT -5
Here we go sticking out our chest and getting critical over a differing opinion that in no way can be determined is a wrong one.
I don't understand. Let the guy voice his opinion without getting ridiculed like it's absurd. Can always choose to ignore.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 21:32:10 GMT -5
OKC I'm curios to why you think that. Looking at how you let the celtics trade Jokic who probably a top 3 center and can get you a triple double for Fultz who is probably gonna be more of a SG then PG cause ben simmons is gonna play point forward for them. What? How is that deal relevant to this at all? Fultz is a potential star, people love to get mad when people trade given production for potential production and never give credit when it actually works out. If Fultz is a super star and is locked up cheap it works out for Yacob who doesn't have a point guard and is loaded down low. Meanwhile you just traded for a player who has hit his peak and because missed shots are -1 is limited while giving away a guy who is cheaper, younger, and scored five points more all while adding a guy who went 5th overall a year ago. Oh and btw he was just traded to a team that should let him have all the minutes he needs to develop. No offense really but I don't get why you're coming in here just telling people they're voting wrong and that trades shouldn't be passed. Why don't you chill and get a feel for the league before you start throwing shit out there. Like not saying you can't have opinions or even that this couldn't end up working out for you, but cmon man Im not mad about that trade i understood it.. i was just asking him a question to understand his values. Whats the point of a trade committee if i can't ask question to the people who are voting. I'm not trying to tell anyone they are voting wrong but whats the point of these threads if i cant state an opinion don't have to agree with it. and if you read my post i said simmons is gonna play a lot a point guard like lebron.. Fultz will play more off the ball like what irving does. The Sixers coach has said multiply times he wants the ball to be in simmons hands a lot next year. So essentially Fultz will be a SG playing the spot of PG like the example i used with Kyrie Irving. Nba teams based there trade value off of what others teams trade for example Paul George trade value went down due to what the bulls got for Jimmy Butler so i view trades in this league the same way. If jokic who has proved to be dominant is trade for an unproven guy then ima base my trade value off that. So an unproven dunn and an average center in nikola for an all start guard was based of that trade for me. And if you also read what i said about the trade is that i understood that Dunn got traded to a team where he as a lot more of an opportunity. Nikola shoots will go down with the development of aaron gordon and addition of Isaac also nikola has an injury history that Thompson does not.. hard to contribute when your not always available to play. Thirdly your crazy if you think a player peaks at 27 years old.MJ aint when his first ring till after 28. Westbrook just averaged a triple double at 28. Kd is 28.Hell lebron just had a career year 32. Kobe didn't win his last 2 title till after 30.i can go on and on if you want me to. A player is just entering his prime years at 26 or 27 years old not his peak lmao. I'm not just throwing shit at there kinda know what I'm talking about believe it or not. |
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs (Chris) on Jun 25, 2017 3:44:09 GMT -5
Ummm, wow. As for the trade, pass, agree with what mavs said 100%. As for the rest... Think you jumped down his throat a little hard there, wars, he voiced his question respectfully enough, even if he is dead wrong don't know that he deserved that. Suns, no reason to get upset if a trade gets vetoed, especially when you're new; think most of us could probably recall an early trade or three we wish had been vetoed. Worst case scenario, you'd have been left with Dunn and Vuc, and honestly you could've gotten a lot more for them. When it comes to players peaking, yes Suns you're generally right, but in this case wars is right, the likelihood of Klay improving beyond what he now contributes is minimal, and I'd pray that he stays with GSW if i were you, his value would almost certainly go way down anywhere else.
Sent from my Pixel using proboards
|
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Pelicans (Alex) on Jun 26, 2017 10:01:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden State Warriors (Caleb) on Dec 22, 2017 15:40:17 GMT -5
@terence Sorry if I came across as a dick, was just tying to look out for your team. Shooting guards just don't score well in here
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2017 18:33:55 GMT -5
Golden state Warriors... no worries man. yeah looking back probably could have gotten more for those players. but i still think Thompson might end up on a new team after this year. and i still have good point guard depth with schroder and.. ntilikina who i have liked what i have seen from him so far and is still only 18 so has a lot of developing left.. dewanye dedmon was giving me a great production before he got hurt.. i also think alan williams could have been big if he wasn't hurt, he was a double double monster for the suns at the tail end of last years and thought he could have been surprising players this year.. injuries kinda just hit my team hard this year but still like the young players i have.. don't think I'm that far out from competing and will have a good pick and decent cap space for next year. but you are right looking at the numbers dunn and vuvevic are putting up it kind shitty haha.
|
|
