|
Post by Dallas Mavs (Kyle) on Aug 18, 2021 16:22:16 GMT -5
The overall approach was to rank teams based on the expected number of rings if things were to play out over the next 5+ years. While I attempted to rankone by one within the tiers, a lot of these are way too subjective to actually stack and the tiers should be the main focus vs. the exact numeric ranking. Things that were considered: 1. Current roster production, age, and contracts 2. Draft capital 3. The ability to consolidate/liquidate assets for other assets of similar and/or different types A small extra weight is given to near term team quality. Too many variables are in play to reliably predict more than a year or two down the line. While future value was not ignored, the adage that “a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow” in general applies nicely here. A few general categories seem to describe most teams: Now & Later - These teams are setup to win yesterday, today, tomorrow, and when Jsood next owns his own first Twilight - Window is closing soon Dawn - Not quite ready, but could be scary soon Purgatory - Not awful now, not great enough later. Need to commit in any direction. Probably has traded away future picks limiting ability to tank but doesn’t have firepower to get a ring as is Oof - Not close to a ring now and path to get there isn’t clear With that said, here are the rankings:
|
|
|
Post by Washington Wizards (octstuff) on Aug 19, 2021 1:18:28 GMT -5
Moronic, I think we should introduce age and IQ check before let anyone post.
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls (Charlie) on Aug 19, 2021 9:39:52 GMT -5
Golden shovel skill unaccounted for in this graphic.
|
|
|
Post by Washington Wizards (octstuff) on Nov 10, 2021 6:07:48 GMT -5
Just here to laugh 😂😂😂😂 Best biased power ranking ever. This guy should do this weekly.
|
|