|
|
Post by Grizzlies GM (Royce) on Nov 30, 2020 13:41:27 GMT -5
Submit 2021 rule changes for discussion
Discussion will happen on separate posts
|
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder (Loren) on Nov 30, 2020 13:51:32 GMT -5
Change scoring system to DraftKings scoring or standard ESPN scoring. Scoring change would take place two years after passed (I.e. - if passed after the 20/21 season, change would take place after the 21/22 and 22/23 season. So would be in effect for the 23/24 season). This gives time for those teams who want to win now to still do that as well as give owners time to plan/adjust to the new system. Scoring changes aren’t drastic but does have some effect on players values & contracts
I know this is probably the hardest thing to change in this league so open to discussion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls (Charlie) on Nov 30, 2020 14:05:05 GMT -5
Change scoring system to DraftKings scoring or standard ESPN scoring. Scoring change would take place two years after passed (I.e. - if passed after the 20/21 season, change would take place after the 21/22 and 22/23 season. So would be in effect for the 23/24 season). This gives time for those teams who want to win now to still do that as well as give owners time to plan/adjust to the new system. Scoring changes aren’t drastic but does have some effect on players values & contracts I know this is probably the hardest thing to change in this league so open to discussion. I say no just because the scoring makes the league unique. Had it forever, it's headassery but it I think everyone's been fine with it. |
|
|
|
Post by Heat GM (Bryan) on Nov 30, 2020 14:53:13 GMT -5
Change scoring system to DraftKings scoring or standard ESPN scoring. Scoring change would take place two years after passed (I.e. - if passed after the 20/21 season, change would take place after the 21/22 and 22/23 season. So would be in effect for the 23/24 season). This gives time for those teams who want to win now to still do that as well as give owners time to plan/adjust to the new system. Scoring changes aren’t drastic but does have some effect on players values & contracts I know this is probably the hardest thing to change in this league so open to discussion. I say no just because the scoring makes the league unique. Had it forever, it's headassery but it I think everyone's been fine with it. So keep it because we've always had it? Dumb reason, the scoring system heavily favors big for no reason. I'm with Loren on this one, scoring system need a big changeup. |
|
|
|
Post by Milwaukee Bucks (Jacob) on Nov 30, 2020 14:55:51 GMT -5
Ban sixers in 2021
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden State Warriors (Caleb) on Nov 30, 2020 15:07:40 GMT -5
Change scoring system to DraftKings scoring or standard ESPN scoring. Scoring change would take place two years after passed (I.e. - if passed after the 20/21 season, change would take place after the 21/22 and 22/23 season. So would be in effect for the 23/24 season). This gives time for those teams who want to win now to still do that as well as give owners time to plan/adjust to the new system. Scoring changes aren’t drastic but does have some effect on players values & contracts I know this is probably the hardest thing to change in this league so open to discussion. I get it. Honestly man.. our scoring is probably not the best. I actually led an unsuccessful campaign to change it 2 years back. But at this point we’ve had the league running for 10 years with it. I also don’t think it’s as crazy a gap as people think. It really just hurts volume shooters who only score. Teams have built their long term plans with it. Is it really worth it to put in some 2 year transition plan? Idk. Just think of it as that retarded friend in your friend group who annoys the fuck out of you and has flaws but at the end of the day you love him and have been rocking with him from day 1. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers GM (Kyle) on Nov 30, 2020 16:40:06 GMT -5
Change Rebounds from 1.5 to 1 starting in 2022/2023
This would happen gradually to give teams time to adjust.
2021/2022 Rebounds = 1.50 FPPG
2022/2023 Rebounds = 1.33 FPPG
2023/2024 Rebounds = 1.17 FPPG
2024/2025 Rebounds = 1.00 FPPG
|
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia 76ers GM (Kyle) on Nov 30, 2020 16:44:29 GMT -5
Use NBA rookie scale to determine the contracts given to rookies.
In real life, teams select whoever they think is the best player available generally speaking since the contract is already basically set in stone at whatever slot they pick at. In this league, we have to take into account what their actual contract is instead of it purely being about talent evaluation. I think if we used the rookie scale, the draft would be a closer representation to real life since players' contracts would be according to how THIS league specifically values the players as opposed to the opinions of the real life teams. This change could happen as soon as next season since it wouldn't really affect the way teams are built currently.
|
|
|
|
Post by Milwaukee Bucks (Jacob) on Nov 30, 2020 17:40:34 GMT -5
Dude ur banned lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Heat GM (Bryan) on Nov 30, 2020 23:16:12 GMT -5
MOVING TO A NEW SITE:
My take, we should have done this a while ago but I think its time to actually use to a dynasty friendly website like Fantrax.
Pros:
Ability for 30 teams to be on same league page
Cross conference matchups
Salary cap functions
Draft feature
Ability to track multiple things over the history of the league including player performance
Cons:
Not free
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington Wizards (octstuff) on Dec 1, 2020 4:29:32 GMT -5
FA and Rookies:
I already stated my concern about starting FA before knowing Rookies salary. Now i was told that i am over the cap, while my last move was a week ago. We should never start FA before knowing Rookies salary and in situation like this we need to have a time to make moves, ill say till end of off season.
Message i got is. You are over the cap, please cut someone.
No i will not just cut someone. We need time for that. Player that put me over the cap is rookie that i picked, 10 days ago. After that i was bidding for FA and my bid was never invalid, so how can this be ? Its either bad rules or lazy updating.
This need to be changed. We need time for adjustments, not just cut someone
|
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies GM (Royce) on Dec 1, 2020 8:26:23 GMT -5
FA and Rookies: I already stated my concern about starting FA before knowing Rookies salary. Now i was told that i am over the cap, while my last move was a week ago. We should never start FA before knowing Rookies salary and in situation like this we need to have a time to make moves, ill say till end of off season. Message i got is. You are over the cap, please cut someone. No i will not just cut someone. We need time for that. Player that put me over the cap is rookie that i picked, 10 days ago. After that i was bidding for FA and my bid was never invalid, so how can this be ? Its either bad rules or lazy updating. This need to be changed. We need time for adjustments, not just cut someone Wasn't trying to rush you, you can also trade someone instead of cut someone. Up to you. 100% agree, rookie scale is needed. |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls (Charlie) on Dec 13, 2020 13:33:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Dallas Mavs (Kyle) on Mar 16, 2021 13:23:50 GMT -5
based on gleague discord convo
Teams must activate players from gleague if all of the following are met:
1. they own their draft pick in the upcoming draft
2. they do not have a full roster of reasonably active players (aka none are retired, obviously out of league, longterm out of rotation, etc) and would not need to cut somebody to activate the player from the gleague
3. the gleague player would fill 2 or more currently empty lineup slots in the matchup
|
|
|
|
Post by Dallas Mavs (Kyle) on Aug 10, 2021 14:22:39 GMT -5
Ring Chasing and Home Town discount
Ring chaser bonus:
.25 bonus bid score for every win an owner had in the prior year above 15.
Home town discount:
Flat 4 point bid score increase for a player who meets both of the following criteria
1) Was drafted by or acquired during the draft year by the team making the bid
2) Was on the team of the person making the bid at the end of the prior season
The ring chaser bonus will encourage competing and mimic real life. The home town discount will actually create more realistic free agency by giving less incentive to trade guys off for re-sign schedules. More stars will be present in FA if this is available. Also mimics real life where stars aren’t just traded to align contract timelines.
To use these benefits the bidding team must lay them out and itemize on every bid posted when eligible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden State Warriors (Caleb) on Aug 10, 2021 16:24:03 GMT -5
Ring Chasing and Home Town discount Ring chaser bonus: .25 bonus bid score for every win an owner had in the prior year above 15. Home town discount: Flat 4 point bid score increase for a player who meets both of the following criteria 1) Was drafted by or acquired during the draft year by the team making the bid 2) Was on the team of the person making the bid at the end of the prior season The ring chaser bonus will encourage competing and mimic real life. The home town discount will actually create more realistic free agency by giving less incentive to trade guys off for re-sign schedules. More stars will be present in FA if this is available. Also mimics real life where stars aren’t just traded to align contract timelines. To use these benefits the bidding team must lay them out and itemize on every bid posted when eligible. While this is well thought out and a cool idea I'll give you the reason(s) as to why i'm opposed. End of the day some dudes in here are just better at being GMs than others. I have to act in the best interest of the 29 other owners out here. Making the better teams and GMs have an added advantage in FA is not something i'm interested in. We actually have a well balanced league where even the "bad" teams all have assets. As for the hometown discount, I know you want to create an amazing home grown dynasty and honestly you're well on your way, but the rules are in place for a reason. The FA class is already weaker than it is IRL anyways. This is just going to make it easier for good GMs and owners to retain their squad. I know this league was created with the intention of making it as similar to real life as possible, but there are just going to be certain spots where it doesn't make sense to replicate real life. There are so many factors irl that determine where guys end up and because we obviously dont have any real discussions with players the only way we can do is by the money/year mix. |
|
