|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls (Charlie) on Aug 13, 2019 11:14:44 GMT -5
What's good ya'll, just was thinking that ESPN has been dogshit these last few years with eligibilities being weird and us having to have a West and an East league. I think a new fantasy site would be good, but whats out there? I think fantrax could be an option but we have a unique scoring system to say the least and I'm curious if we would be able to implement it there. I'll look into it, also yahoo or cbs sports could be an option.
Basically we need a site that allows us to customize scoring pts wise and hold 30 teams. If anyone has any ideas or knows lmk
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls (Charlie) on Aug 13, 2019 11:36:34 GMT -5
Well, Fantrax checks out, I can implement our scoring and everything. Though to have a 30 team league it cost 80 big bux.
Who wanna pitch in!!
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs (Chris) on Aug 13, 2019 13:42:35 GMT -5
Personally I like Yahoo, but they haven't ever offered sufficient manipulation of scoring options to allow a league like this... It's slowly gotten more flexible, maybe it'd be an option this year but you can't check until they "open" the season. Never used Fantrax, I would be willing to pay because fuck ESPN, but I think it'd be real hard to figure out a fair way of making that happen; unless there's enough other guys who'd be willing to just throw in some money without worrying about fairness, in which case I'd be down to put up $10 or $20.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls (Charlie) on Aug 13, 2019 13:47:44 GMT -5
Honestly I'd put up 40, I wanna make sure the league stays active during the year so I'll be doing some things like rankings, previews, analysis shit.
just looking through everything, Fantrax does look dope and has a bunch of features.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockets GM (Tony) on Aug 13, 2019 15:12:33 GMT -5
I would be in for fantrax
|
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets (Kevin) on Aug 13, 2019 19:51:10 GMT -5
Would we be able to play teams in different conferences? Vis a vi west/east
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls (Charlie) on Aug 13, 2019 21:31:56 GMT -5
Yes, we could manipulate the schedule to play multiple out of conference games or since we usually have one bye week, you could play a team from the other conference that week.
I think that'd be dope, I could whoop your ass in the reg season kev that's where i make my money
|
|
|
|
Post by San Antonio Spurs (Chris) on Aug 14, 2019 0:58:41 GMT -5
been doing some research on fantrax, seems like they also allow the commish to manually adjust positional eligibility, so... that's cool, as the shit job ESPN does is probably my single biggest gripe with them (that and the inability to research prior years' fantasy points scored). we could do like a TC style vote on anybody that a manager thought should have additional or different eligibility. just saying, i like it.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Pelicans (Alex) on Aug 14, 2019 7:17:55 GMT -5
been doing some research on fantrax, seems like they also allow the commish to manually adjust positional eligibility, so... that's cool, as the shit job ESPN does is probably my single biggest gripe with them (that and the inability to research prior years' fantasy points scored). we could do like a TC style vote on anybody that a manager thought should have additional or different eligibility. just saying, i like it. Could easily see a vote like that being abused tho. |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bulls (Charlie) on Aug 14, 2019 12:18:16 GMT -5
i think putting a set rule in place for when a player can acquire a certain position (like minutes played there or something) instead of voting on whether a player deserves a position could take the bias out and it wouldn't be abused.
but yeah Fantrax does look pretty awesome, it better for $80
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockets GM (Tony) on Aug 14, 2019 16:24:53 GMT -5
We could use Basketball Reference % played at a position
|
|
